“I refer to this one as ‘the big one,’” said the official, Matt Combes, an ecological health unit science supervisor for the Missouri Department of Conservation. He added: “Calling something a near-total fish kill for 60 miles of a river is astounding and disheartening.”

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    The fish kill was one of the five largest on record in Iowa, according to state data, and the worst since runoff from a dairy farm in 2013 killed more than 800,000 fish. The federal Environmental Protection Agency does not keep similar data on the national level, a spokesman said.

    Why doesn’t the EPA keep data on a national level???!!?!?

    Like wtf?

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because then people would know how often this happens and where. Can’t have that disrupting things

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like most other agencies designed to"protect" people, they’ve been severely refunded, which relates back to your answer.

    • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      EPA is a federal agency and as such they only care about playing the hierarchy game and not about anything else