• Altofaltception@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    The US could at any point have assisted with getting aid into Gaza over land. All they’d need to do is tell Israel to back off and lift their blockade.

    Instead this gives a US base in Gaza. Obviously we are going to take this option.

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      All they needed to do is tell Israel

      The feds can’t force Texas to stop shooting migrants you think they can force Israel to stop doing anything they’re set on?

      • eskimofry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean the CIA can kill U.S citizens if needed but I laugh that you think the U.S government can’t mobilize when enough motivations appear.

        • whereisk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          you think the U.S government can’t mobilize when enough motivations appear

          Can you point to the part where I put forward that argument?

        • whereisk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Look, I’ll put it this way: there is no upside to the US in any of this.

          Ok, let’s run the scenario: the US administration without approval from congress pulls some kind of magic trick and blocks weapon sales to Israel tonight.

          What series of events do you think would unfold?

          How would local politics unfold in the US, in Israel, in Palestine and in each of the surrounding countries?

          Is peace now nearer? A two state solution closer?

          Or would Israel, now that the bandaid has been pulled and no further threat remains, would decide that nothing will stop them, that they are on their own and they might as well just finish the job thoroughly?

          Would Hamas declare that victory is near without the US involvement and redouble their efforts? Would Israel decide they need to find more reliable partners and turn to China? Or Russia? What would China do? Russia? Iran? Jordan? Egypt? Saudi Arabia?

          Do you not think the US would have been much better off geopolitically for this thing to have gone away 6 decades ago? Why have they been trying with summit after summit?

          This conflict has been sustained over the decades from different political actors for different reasons, some of them petty and pathetic, some religious and some geopolitical.

          There are plenty of hungry sharks around ready to take their pound of flesh and it’s not to help the Palestinians - we know the neighbours don’t give a shit about them (except rhetorically) by the way they treat refugees within their own borders

          There’s no magic button to press to solve it.

          This is like the 3 body problem, but really it’s 20 moving celestial bodies.

          • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t care about the weapons. Israel obviously doesn’t need more weapons to finish their genocide.

            It’s just pretty obvious that you don’t make a real effort to prevent a state completing it’s genocide before you stop supplying them with arms.

            • whereisk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Great, but, after that - is there a realistic next day scenario that doesn’t hurt Palestinians more? If so, what is it?

              • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                You’re right there’s absolutely no solution remotely possible, and that justifies the complete lack of even trying anything spicier than “Bibi pls”

                • whereisk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You’re right there’s absolutely no solution remotely possible, and that justifies the complete lack of even trying anything spicier than “Bibi pls”

                  Come on, that’s a bit weak - is strawmanning the best you can do?

                  • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    My guy you’re literally saying there’s no solution that isn’t worse than doing what the current administration is doing, which is more or less nothing.

                    That’s not a straw man. That’s just restating your argument at you.