• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This seems extremely deceptive, possibly deliberately so. Being influenced by catholic teachings does not mean you agree with everything they believe. Even someone who rejects every single moral teaching of the church could still be influenced by them in some ways.

          In this case, we don’t need to speculate from some vague statement about the church because Biden has explicitly stated he supported roe v wade, has appointed judges that have pursued this pro-choice ideology, and has even stated that he would sign a bill to reinstate the previous protections for women. Such a bill was put forth in congress but was blocked in the senate. He does not have any direct control over this issue, so it’s hard for me to see what else he even could have done.

          It comes off as very intellectually dishonest to ignore all that and claim he’s “clearly on the record saying he supports the abortion ban” then point to something he didn’t even say and is only tangentially related.

          PS: There are tons of legitimate criticisms of Biden so it’s especially strange to invent ones that are so far from the truth.

          • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Biden being for women’s rights would have been a drastic out of common place executive order restoring women’s rights instead of one advancing research into a field that requires Roe versus Wade