mecfs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1173arrow-down1external-linkWildlife Protections Take a Back Seat to SpaceX’s Ambitionswww.nytimes.commecfs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down2·1 year agoLet me let you in on a little secret, because the title implies otherwise - wildlife protection was never a priority, and will never become one, to any company under capitalism, but especially to a company like that.
minus-squareNegativeNull@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoWith the Chevron case, we likely won’t see any additional protections coming either.
minus-squareDessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoAnd I’m sure that isn’t the only case either…
minus-squaresunzu@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThere is always this framing that we are now getting fucked over… Which is disingenuous since peasants are always getting fucked over.
Let me let you in on a little secret, because the title implies otherwise - wildlife protection was never a priority, and will never become one, to any company under capitalism, but especially to a company like that.
With the Chevron case, we likely won’t see any additional protections coming either.
And I’m sure that isn’t the only case either…
There is always this framing that we are now getting fucked over… Which is disingenuous since peasants are always getting fucked over.