• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Of course they are. It’s the whole military. More specificaly The National Guard. We have permanent professional soldiers who replaced the militia long ago.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The military and national guard aren’t militia, they are armies. A select militia is no militia at all. And professional soldiers can’t replace a militia as it is them who on rare occasion they are tasked with opposing.

      At the siege of Boston the Connecticut militia along with the Green Mountain Boys, and the men of Massachusetts showed up to oppose the British regulars. The regulars were professional soldiers. The rest the militia.

      Our professional army maybe our ally in liberty today but history has shown that may not always be the case.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The National Guard are the modern militia. Deployable by the Governor, not the President.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          A select militia is no militia at all. It defeats to core purpose of a militia. And it isn’t deployable by the President. But it is by Congress (then under Exec leadership). Read the Federalist Papers/Antifederalists Papers. Throw Blackstone and Story in there too.

          To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; -Article 1 Sec 8

          The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; - Article 2 Sec 2