Not sure why this was removed for rule 1, as there was no attack on anyone’s person, it was entirely a criticism of the study.
Unless it was for describing journalists who refuse to provide direct references to the studies they write about as “fuckers”, in which case I can edit that part out once the comment is restored, even though it was not directed at any one person.
Not sure why this was removed for rule 1, as there was no attack on anyone’s person, it was entirely a criticism of the study.
Unless it was for describing journalists who refuse to provide direct references to the studies they write about as “fuckers”, in which case I can edit that part out once the comment is restored, even though it was not directed at any one person.