Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    IMO, the issue is purely down to their strength and ability to kill a person.

    I don’t doubt their temperament is fine, but when an animal has that much power they’re a serious danger in the rare situation that they’re out of control.

    I like Jack Russells, I’ve got two, if they were strong dogs and someone said they’re being banned because of it then I wouldn’t mind. Just don’t let them breed any more.

    A dog’s a dog. While I have a preference, ultimately I don’t really care what breed I have.

    Pugs should be banned as well. A dog’s a dog, not a fashion accessory.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t doubt their temperament is fine

      Pits have an incredibly strong prey drive, and once they decide to attack something they almost never stop. So no, they don;t have the best temperament.

      Pugs should be banned as well

      There’s at least a retro-pug movement now that is working to breed the overly shortened snout out of pugs, and make them a healthier breed.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pugs Bulldogs they should be banned for their health reasons.

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem with “don’t ban them but don’t let them breed more” and allow people that have one to just carry on is you just create a potentially lucrative black market for these dogs (in fact you doing that might make them more sought after), which doesn’t actually fix any problems.

      Not necessarily advocating killing animals because they’re inconvenient but ultimately if they’re going to be a problem (and it certainly seems like that’s the case) then the sooner they’re banned the less harm is inflicted overall.

      • sirjash@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Black market for dogs that shouldn’t exist anymore after 10 years? What would you do with a dog you couldn’t take out of the house? Where’s the demand? I can’t imagine pitbull junkies selling everything they own just to get one more pup either

        • dan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well the black market doesn’t exist because it’s not legal to own a pitbull - as you say, who wants a dog they can’t take outside?

          My point is if you ban breeding but you don’t ban owning the dog then you risk creating that black market.

    • tallwookie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pugs should be banned as well. A dog’s a dog, not a fashion accessory.

      completely disagree, my last dog was a pug & I loved the shit out of that lil guy. best 10 years of my life.

      next dog will probably be a Frenchie, they’re super cute.

      • dan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The issue with pugs is not that they’re evil or bad creatures, it’s that humans have selectively bred them for their looks, but that’s lead to the animals suffering because their breeding means they have massive problems with breathing, their knees, spine, eyes, etc. That’s unfair on the animal.

        It’s like saying we want to eliminate genetic diseases like Down’s syndrome or Haemophilia. Nobody’s saying individuals with those conditions are bad, it’s that we don’t think people should be born with conditions that give them a worse life.

        Now for dogs it’s a bit more complicated because those conditions are afflicted upon them by us purely for aesthetics, and if dogs are banned that inevitably leads to some being killed which isn’t very fair on those animals, but if we can’t find a way to reverse the worst aspects of their breeding is the only way we can prevent further suffering.