• stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The why is in an article they link to about the initial decision now being appealed. The link is in the first paragraph.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      From that other article:

      Judge Caroline Wall on Friday found that “upon hearing the arguments of counsel and considering the briefs filed by counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants” the plaintiffs’ Second Amendment petition “should and shall be” dismissed with prejudice, court records show.

      I’m even more confused now. Were the plaintiffs attempting to bring this lawsuit on Second Amendment grounds?

      CNN still doesn’t list the case name or link to the decision so one can read more.