• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the argument is that unfair competition due to “biological advantages” should be reduced then I agree. Sports should be segregated by performance classes and open to all genders.

    That’s probably the ideal solution, but the problem is that nobody’s gonna watch anything except the top leagues. I mean watching the kinda good but not really amazing people’s football league just isn’t an appealing prospect, unless I misunderstood what you meant by performance classes. The whole point of this debate (other than conservatives shitting on trans women anyway) is that you need a framework where:

    1-trans people can compete, 2-cis women aren’t unfairly disadvantaged and 3-that people would actually watch.

    I’m frankly not sure such a thing exists.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If we can only have two of those three then ditching the commerciality of it all would be my preference. Sports are actually worth watching when they aren’t just an excuse to extract profit from professional and collegiate athletes.

      Realistically, we can’t have 3 in any case. Women’s sports gets a tiny fraction of the viewership as it is and I don’t see the inclusion or exclusion of trans women affecting those numbers much.