The biggest name in Jeffrey Epstein’s birthday book back in 2003 was a past president rather than a future one.

Archive - https://archive.is/0RtlY

    • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Raping kids, trafficing minors, and for single crime that pig did. That answer your dumb question?

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Is there concrete evidence? Let’s not erode due process any more than is already happening.

        • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          There is a mountain of evidence including testimony under oath from many of the victims as well as Maxwell. Bondi also warned him that he appears repeatedly throughout the papers. You are welcome to look any of it up. 🦭

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Then they should be arrested on that evidence, not just for being a name on a list.

              • AmidFuror@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                “Arrest every single one of them…”

                You need more evidence to arrest someone as an accomplice to child rape and sex trafficking than that they sent a birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein before his first arrest. There are 50 people on the list, including Epstein’s family members.

                Why does every thread on pedophiles have to go off the rails because people think if the crime is heinous enough, you just round up everyone without reasonable cause or probable suspicion?

                • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  50 minutes ago

                  I think it’s a slightly different dynamic happening. Definitely when the crime is heinous people get riled up and demand “justice” at any cost.

                  But I don’t think everyone here is saying “based on this list alone courts have enough evidence”, but rather “if they’re on this list for sure there’s mountains of other evidence, lock them up”.

                  Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s how I’m interpreting it.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Keep in mind that the list is of people who wrote birthday letters to Epstein, including his family members, and that the commenter’s suggestion was that they all be arrested.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Yeah it’s totally just a benign letter. That’s why he’s suing a newspaper for revealing it. Totally benign…

        • AmidFuror@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There is a bunch of knee-jerk voting happening in this comment thread. You’re currently at 6 downvotes and I’m at 8 for suggesting birthday well wishes are not evidence of pedophilia.

          Edit: not evidence