Gates’ connection to the U.S. detention and deportation machine is a company called Signature Aviation. Signature calls itself “the world’s largest network of private aviation terminals,” and it’s a linchpin in the day-to-day machinery of Trump’s immigration enforcement apparatus.

The private firm that holds Gates’ and the Gates Foundation Trust’s assets, Cascade Investment, increased its stake in the company to 30% in 2021, when it and two partners bought Signature outright for $4.7 billion. Human rights advocates — plane trackers and activists who keep tabs on deportation flights, as well as the aviation and logistics companies profiting from them — say Gates’ stake in Signature is at odds with his humanitarian work, including the Gates Foundation’s support of a plethora of immigration-focused nonprofits. Without FBOs like Signature, they say, Trump’s mass deportation agenda would be stuck on the ground.

Gates himself has not publicly commented on Signature Aviation’s crucial role in servicing ICE Air flights. Neither the Gates Foundation nor Cascade Asset Management Company, which oversees Cascade Investment, responded to multiple requests for comment.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250910112339/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bill-gates-trump-ice-signature-aviation_n_68acd96fe4b0d17ae21e7ec4

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Bill Gates has been working very hard since he retired to make himself look like a nice old man doing good around him spending his money on philanthropy.

    But here’s the truth: the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation makes more money through its investments than it disburses through philanthropy, and its tax-exempt status is used by Bill Gates as a vehicle for tax evasion.

    Just like all rich fucks’ foundations incidentally: if you ever wondered how comes so many of those psychopaths do philanthropy, that’s why. They don’t give a damn about their fellow man. If they did, they’d pay their fair share of taxes for the good of everybody instead of cherry-picking a few high-profile causes that make them look good. Billionaires philanthropy is all about tax evasion.

    And now this.

    Make no mistake: Bill Gates today is just as disgusting an individual as you remember him to be when he was running Microsoft.

    • ater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Gates Foundation paid for my town’s shiny new rural hospital, bringing in multiple MRI machines, a PET scanner, etc to make it one of the most advanced hospitals in the region.

      But the hospital can’t afford to staff radiologists, so the machines are useless. Last year they sat around hemming and hawing for several hours while my husband was laying there with symptoms of a stroke, trying to decide whether it would be faster (let’s be real, the debate was cheaper) to call in a radiologist or transport him to another hospital (they ended up picking the latter).

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is why philanthropy is worse than just taxing and spending.

        Huge sums of money from rich people going toward “charitable causes” can be have negative consequences. Ex.

        • The money can be spent wastefully or stupidly, like in your example.
        • The money can be used corruptly. It could be rewarding friends, buying power, or simply redirect other funds toward other business interests of the donor.
        • Destructive to established systems. Allocating money to X can shift high value employees or entire industries away from Y.
        • The money could suddenly just go away if the billionaire favors another pet project or something else.
    • affenlehrer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, the philanthropy is still controlled by rich guys and spent for what they want, not what’s needed. They might be doing some good but not in a democratic way. They still hold all the power

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        And in a way that makes people believe that they’re doing good and that we can trust the billionaires to have society’s best interests at heart. They’re laundering their image while continuing to enrich themselves.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      And this whole bilkuonaire philanthropy thing is bullshit to begin with. How come one single man gets to focus a shot ton of resources on a single cause he deems worthy? Why not just pay taxes and let the people choose?

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Its painful to think how many people kept praising Gates and defending him over the years. He has his greedy little fingers in everything. Kurzgesagt has a bunch of questionable episodes and whenever people pointed out their ties to Gates they were called schizo conspiracy theorists.

      • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah. Cynicism would be me saying the Gates Foundation does good, and you saying mostly to Gates.

        But you’re simply acknowledging what’s obvious to anybody who knows anything about how the rich keep themselves rich at the expense of everybody else. That’s realism, if anything.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He does work hard to maintain an image that fools most Murcans. ABAB All Billies Are Bastards.