• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Neither. Your comment blamed parents but not Meta. It also talked about “men on the internet” as if they can be expected, as a normal man thing, to be into photos of kids. The concern is not men in general but pedophiles. And the responsibility is not just with parents but with Meta.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sorry but this is just hilarious. Stupid parents mindlessly posted picture of their children on the internet and are not outraged that someone dared to look at them in a way they didn’t expect. Is the picture sexual or not? If not, who cares how some guy looks at it. If yes, why would parents post them? I know, let’s insert some imagined pedophiles into this story so we can justify our rage.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Stupid parents

        Idgaf how stupid their parents are, kids should be protected from being fucking pimped out to sell meta’s brainwashing trash

        Is the picture sexual or not?

        Give me a break, if we know fucking anything about human sexuality its that different people get aroused by different shit, and sometimes they get aroused by shit they shouldn’t, like children

        who cares how some guy looks at it

        It feels worth noting here that what actually happened is a single 37 year old dude took it upon himself to call a newspaper and say “yo, Facebook is shoving a bunch of schoolgirls pictures in my face, no boys, just girls, like I think they expect me to be into it, and that feels wrong.” There was no creepy man in this story, the only creep here was the algorithm.