The recall covers certain Models Y, S and X from the 2023 model year. All are equipped with “Full Self-Driving” computer 4.0 and run software version 2023.44.30 through 2023.44.30.6 or 2023.44.100.

The company says in documents posted by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that software instability may prevent the camera image from showing images while the Teslas are in reverse. The safety agency says that can increase the risk of a crash.

Tesla says in documents that it is not aware of any crashes or injuries. Documents say the problem has been fixed with an online software update.

Owners will be notified by letter starting March 22.

  • Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a recall, it’s just that they can fix it with as software update.

    • ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      A recall in my mind is when I have to bring my car into a dear ship/ repair shop to have it fixed not just click update. It isn’t like they are pulling the vehicles off the road.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Your perception of what a recall is does not align with what a recall is in a legal sense.

      • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s still called a recall. Any time there’s a mass issue with vehicles that requires manufacturer intervention, that’s a recall.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          While this is technically a recall because it relates to vehicles, it is more akin to Apple releasing a fix to iOS because the selfie-cam sometimes doesn’t work.

          Your argument is doing more to convince me that not every recall is newsworthy than this is actually a big deal.

          And I fucking hate Musk and Tesla. Show me a 200000 vehicle recall that actually pulls cars off the road and I’ll celebrate the stock price drop hurting Elon’s wallet. But this event doesn’t feel significant.

          I’m reminded of early in Trump’s Presidency when folks would lose their minds over perfectly normal shit he was doing such as firing political appointees from the previous admin. Like, maybe it’s just a slow day for news. Instead of trying to make something about a nothing story, wait a day or two and they’ll do something mind-blowingly idiotic because that is their nature. It won’t be a long wait and then we can all laugh/rage at these assholes again.

          Instead we get essentially a clickbait headline that is “technically true” but completely misleading.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            it is more akin to Apple releasing a fix to iOS because the selfie-cam sometimes doesn’t work.

            It’s not at all because that’s not a safety issue. Recalls are only for safety issues that manufacturers refuse to fix.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              People have been backing up for over 100 years without a backup camera. Calling it a safety issues is stretching that definition.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  None of that changes the fact that this isn’t killing anyone, and if Tesla is to be believed (it’s not, but I haven’t seen a counter-narrative to suggest otherwise) it hasn’t caused any property damage, and it isn’t going to cost Telsa more than a few hours of overtime to fix it. This is not interesting or relevant to anyone whether they love or hate Musk or own a Tesla.

                  To have a headline that says there is a 200000 vehicle recall - no matter how technically accurate it is - is a misleading headline designed to get people to click only to find out it’s a non-issue that no one gives a fuck about.

                  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    None of that changes the fact that this isn’t killing anyone

                    I just cited a statistic that not having a backup camera kills and injures tens of thousands of people/year. If you want to present evidence to the contrary, please feel free.

                    is a misleading headline designed to get people to click only to find out it’s a non-issue

                    Just because you have a misunderstanding of how recalls work doesn’t make it misleading.

          • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No argument here, I completely agree that this isn’t newsworthy. People just see “recall” but don’t realize those can be software patches.

        • ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Recall: a public call by a manufacturer for the return of a product that may be defective or contaminated

          There is no return of a product.