• valaramech@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there’s no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

    The only potential loophole that I can discern is that there’s no clear consensus on if Trump would be allowed to run as Vice-President on someone else’s ticket. If he can, then, theoretically, he could run for VP and then have the elected President immediately resign, making him the President again.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      He absolutely could do that. The amendment specifically says elected to the office of the President, it does not prohibit attaining the office by any other means.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The 22nd amendment to the US Constitution bars Trump as a viable candidate for the Office of the President. It would require an additional amendment to be possible and there’s no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

      I no longer believe the process and laws of our government will apply to this administration. We’ll see.

    • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      12 hours ago

      …there’s no way that 3/4ths of all US states will agree to that shit.

      We’ve had an extraordinary number of “there’s no way that…” moments in the past decade most of which have been connected to Trump, why tempt fate like that? The 2024 election map has more than the 38 red states needed to ratify a constitutional amendment.

        • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          A stretched the real numbers (33 states for Trump) for the sake of my joke.

          Realistically, Maga passing a constitutional amendment repealing the 22nd (I think) that limits terms for Presidents is possible, but incredibly unlikely. It’s a lengthy process on purpose full of all sorts of ways to slow it down even further or derail it entirely. He has the political will and the power right now and for the next 2 years, but I’d bet if he’s able to pull off even some of his more spectacular plans, enough people would finally get it and he’d lose at least part of Congress, if not all of it.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Or he’s gonna wipe his ass with the Constitution in an X live stream and declare Jan 6 “National Patriots Day” while Fox commentators claim he’s joking.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So right at the end of the 12th amendment there’s this line.

      But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

      So as of his presidential win this election he’s ineligible to be vice president.

      • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The 22a says he can’t be elected. But that doesn’t make him ineligible to serve. The wording presents a loophole that our highly partisan Supreme Court could drive a truck through.

        • evidences@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          With as much as this Supreme Court is riding Trump’s dick I wouldn’t put it past them to rule in his favor if this made it to them.

        • roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Not without Supreme Court fuckery. As it stands, he’d be eligible to serve as Speaker, but he’d be skipped in the line of succession if it were applicable.

          Of course, trusting the Supreme Court to actually follow the rules seems naive at best these days.

        • evidences@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure no.

          There’s a whole bunch of stuff in different parts of the constitution and us code that mention intelligibility in the line of succession. There might be a loop hole around this though I am no constitutional law expert

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Would Trump even hold a candle to motherfucking Obama? 3rd candancy isn’t just for Trump…

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If they do it, it will be by suspending the constitution entirely. Don’t need any states for that.