U.S. President Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News on Saturday, said there would be “serious consequences” if billionaire Elon Musk funds Democratic Party candidates to run against Republicans who vote for Trump’s sweeping tax-cut bill.

Trump declined to say what those consequences would be in the phone interview, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk.

Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, “I would assume so, yeah.”

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m mixed on this. I understand the sentiment, but it probably depends on who they’re running against. If it’s a red state and they’re running against a republican, I would be fine with them taking the money.

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Just ignore the labels for a second- would you prefer to vote for the nazi-funded candidate?

    • drzoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Musk is a nazi, as evidenced by his nazi salute earlier this year.

      Any democrat that accepts nazi money, it’s saying they’re fine with nazis, which makes them a nazi, because the only scum that’s fine with nazis, are other nazis.

      You can’t condemn nazi behavior while taking money from nazis, and allowing them to support you. You tell them to fuck all the way off, because the only thing a nazi deserves is the comfort of a grave.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’d be acceptable if they also invited him on stage and shot him dead. Take advantage of his comfort towards what he assumes is moral duplicity and stroke his ego a bit, then well kill him.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I see what you’re saying, but taking nazi money from a nazi to spend and then using it to do good in the world? It’s like an ethics trolley problem.

        • drzoidberg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Taking nazi money by seizing his assets is how you go about using nazi money, not by accepting the support of a nazi. If you’re accepting the support of a nazi, you’re no better than conservatives currently accepting the support of nazis.

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I feel like that’s the best option and you’re right. I just don’t see that happening in America now or in the near future. The next best option is to do what the other poster said and say they will not be bought and won’t be doing anything he asks before they take the money. Also, again, they’re not going against another democrat.

            • drzoidberg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              By accepting money from a nazi, they’re saying they can be bought by a nazi. It’s lobbying, and it’s why we file taxes for a return every year, why climate change is ignored, internet isn’t a utility, weed is federally illegal, and the fairness doctrine got chucked out the window.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I wouldn’t say I’d be “fine” with them taking the money under any circumstance. But it’s never going to lead me to voting for repugnacans either directly or indirectly through abstaining.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s what I’m afraid of, that this would lead people to vote 3rd party or republican. Republicans being split up would be great too.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’d go so far as to say Musk donating to a democrat candidate may be done explicitly as a poison pill to reduce support from the base.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You can refuse donations. Or publicly disavow his support if it’s in the form of independently bought media.