• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      352·
      1 year ago

      I use Mac and also open terminal often. Then again, I’m a software engineer and I have work to do, that doesn’t include trying to troubleshoot problems with my OS.

      • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
        131·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the same position. My Linux machine is for gaming and … Interesting tasks that could be hazardous to set up on my Mac.

        The hardware quality is sublime as well. However, dailing Linux for a bit and going back to MacOS made me appreciate it more. Homebrew is a hair slow tho 😂

      • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        I used to use MacOS OS X in the mid-2000s, and the reason why I liked it was precisely because it was the best UNIX.

        It’s a shame Apple moved away from things like bash, Applescript, Automator, Xserve, machines with toolless chassis and good upgradability, etc.

          • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
            31·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, and that shift from copyleft to permissive (bash is GPL-licensed; zsh is MIT-licensed) is emblematic of Apple going from genuinely wanting users to have full control of their system to only begrudgingly tolerating it when they can’t stop it entirely. Apple switched precisely because bash upgraded from GPLv2 to GPLv3 and Apple was butthurt about users’ rights being better protected.

      • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        Linux skills

        Windows skills

        OSX Skills

        Can all often be requirements of a job.

        I just want to throw it out there that you can use any of these products and learn a terminal. Often times Mac does better with photo editing and programming in terms of handling the load balance.

        Knowing one or the other doesn’t make you any better than the rest.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      127·
      1 year ago

      The technology labor market disagrees. Careers are built on mastering the Linux OS.

      • FinalBoy1975@lemmy.worldEnglish
        91·
        1 year ago

        Wow, really? So, basically, since 1999 or so, I could have had a built up career because I mastered the Linux OS. I have built up a career in something else totally unrelated. Do you think I’d be richer and famouser, too? Maybe I should have just thrown myself at the technology labor market and taken control of it, like I do with the terminal app. snort reapplies tape to broken glasses snort snort readjusts pocket protector prefers platform games with a penguin over a guy with a moustache snort snort

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        7·
        1 year ago

        In software, it seems incredibly common for companies to give developers MacBooks and then have their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.

        It’s just one of the lower friction corporate options for software companies. The last time I used an institutionally managed linux computer was college.

        There’s definitely tech jobs where you need to know linux. But there’s also a ton of jobs where you don’t have to know much of anything about it beyond common unix stuff, and where OS X specific knowledge is more useful.

        • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          When time is money, businesses give 0 shits about your Arch install, to be blunt, OSX and Apple are there to do work… Thay being said, I loves me some Unix Porn 😅 Sorry for the spicy reply. ❤️

          • Pipoca@lemmy.world
            3·
            1 year ago

            Companies generally want something they control, so they can lock your computer and wipe it remotely when they lay you off.

            They care about your arch install because they don’t want it any more than your OS X install. Their arch install would be fine, but their JAMF controlled OS X install is probably much cheaper for them to manage, practically speaking.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          2·
          1 year ago

          Because Linux is really good at being a server, and macOS is really good at being a development OS, despite the hate it’s getting in this thread

          • Pipoca@lemmy.world
            2·
            1 year ago

            I honestly think it has very little to do with the OS itself.

            I think it’s more about practicalities and inertia - ordering laptops with the OS preinstalled, administering them, corporate VPN software, etc.

            Both are great development OSs, but OS X is a better corporate OS.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          31·
          1 year ago

          their software deployed on a linux VM in AWS.

          Precisely one niche where mastering the Linux OS provides bread.

      • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        Eric S. Raymond carved Plan 9’s headstone 20 years ago:

        The long view of history may tell a different story, but in 2003 it looks like Plan 9 failed simply because it fell short of being a compelling enough improvement on Unix to displace its ancestor. Compared to Plan 9, Unix creaks and clanks and has obvious rust spots, but it gets the job done well enough to hold its position. There is a lesson here for ambitious system architects: the most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough.

        Raymond predicted subsumation as legacy:

        It may well be that over time, much more of Plan 9 will work its way into Unix as various portions of Unix’s architecture slide into senescence. This is one possible line of development for Unix’s future.

        I wouldn’t call these a ringing endorsement of envy.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        63·
        1 year ago

        You’re fundamentally right, but “no less powerful” is a pretty big stretch, consideration that the majority of the Internet runs on Linux servers, not Mac servers.

        But your point about FreeBSD is right. It’s more work, but most software built for Linux will at least run on Mac if you know your compiler flags well enough.

        But if someone tries to spin up web services on a Mac, they’re going to have a bad time. So I wouldn’t quote say “no less powerful”.

        Edit: but I agree with your core point that the meme is silly and way off base.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          5·
          1 year ago

          Linux’s big competitive advantage in web servers is licensing. You don’t have to pay Apple a penny to start up a linux VM, and you don’t have to contractually run it on apple hardware.

          In most modern languages, the difference in building your project on linux vs OS X is basically non-existant. I’ve spent nearly a decade working on backend web services on company MacBooks that get deployed to a linux EC2 instance. Running the server locally makes basically no difference.

          Linux’s advantages are more legal than technical.

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            31·
            1 year ago

            Agreed that the fundamental advantage is licensing.

            But let’s not underestimate the enterprise packaging gulf that this difference has led to.

            It sounds like you and I both could get a full set of web services running on Mac.

            That said, among the diversity of things I’ve had to get running on Mac, it was a lot less simple than on Linux. Which is why I run as much as possible inside Docker.

      • happyhippo@feddit.it
        32·
        1 year ago

        Zero customisability and plenty of poor defaults.

        My 4k€ company MBP 16" is sitting in my drawer while I use my personal XPS running opensuse. Feel right at home and much more productive than before.

      • nogrub@lemmy.world
        72·
        1 year ago

        that’s why i like linux but if we ever want the year of the linux desktop it needs distros to be more gui orientaded normal users get overwhelmed if they even see a terminal window for a second

          • nogrub@lemmy.world
            1·
            1 year ago

            sadly yes i just used it to make a point ^^ in my opponion linix will never really be the dominant os

        • Ademir@lemmy.eco.br
          1·
          1 year ago

          I think we don’t have enough people working in the DEs (Gnome and KDE, mainly) in order to achieve it.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.netEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          no ‘year of the linux desktop’ leave it to the savvy (me, using immutable with distrobox arch), wait for ppl to get really unsatisfied with the enshittification of mainstream OS’s

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        3·
        1 year ago

        MacOS uses Bash/ZSH…
        If you write the scripts in a POSIX way, you can serve both MacOS & Linux with the same script.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        43·
        1 year ago

        OS X is literally a heavily modified version of FreeBSD with a very shiny GUI.

        It ships with a terminal that has zsh installed by default, and homebrew is a decent package manager. You can write scripts for it in precisely the same way you do for Linux.

        It being closed source means you can’t edit the OS itself. And there’s certainly a bunch of weird stuff that it does. But mastering linux and mastering OS X are pretty similar things.

    • azerial@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      46·
      1 year ago

      Mac is annoying. I think the real skill here is just being able to use a terminal. I remember when i worked at EA we had a gazillion Mac mini’s to build ios apps. Due to the way apple likes to handle their certs, you had to update them often. The majority of my coworkers would use a KVM appliance to do so, but it was like 4 commands.

      Terminal for the win. I think we eventually just automated it in the build system. Also Jenkins can fuck off.

    • nogrub@lemmy.world
      39·
      1 year ago

      even thou i don’t really like it but macos is more refined so that it can be used more easily. most linux distros are not really eass to use you have to invest time into it and most people don’t want to do that. we as a linux community should be aware of that problem. yes it’s a problem not a feature

  • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
    321·
    1 year ago

    The more I learn, the bigger the abyss becomes. I will never master Linux. I will, at best, learn some of the currents and how to sail them safely.

    • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
      4·
      1 year ago

      I copied my .zshrc from my Linux laptop to my work Mac, and yep, it all feels the same. A few minor differences (ls on Linux will allow arguments after the files, on Mac it won’t) and a few things to learn (I never really used open on Linux, but it’s essential on Mac), and the clipboard interface is different (xclip vs. pbcopy — but that doesn’t really count, since it’s a GUI thing).

      • Gianni R@lemmy.mlEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        The only weird difference I’ve run into has been the stat command behaving differently with dif args

      • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
        5·
        1 year ago

        Once you’ve installed homebrew the Unix parts of Mac are great. Some of the default utilities like BSD sed aren’t as good as their gnu counterparts, but that’s easily solved by simply installing the gnu version.

        I think valgrind doesn’t really work, and X apps don’t support retina, but aside from that I don’t think there’s much difference.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    136·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had to use a M2 pro for a month now. I expected dumb design choices. I did not expect the amount of bugs and incorrect implementations. MacOS feels like such a shitty operating system. Hardware is decent though.

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      54·
      1 year ago

      It’s so bad, it feels like using an ipad. Notifications are buggy as hell and you can’t even disable notification center with terminal like you could on x86 macs. I’m keeping an eye on Asahi linux but it seems a little too rough to be daily driveable yet.

      Sort of unrelated but the apple support threads are all infuriating because they never answer the question. They embody the “it’s not a bug” motto until it’s clear there is a bug at which point they just say apple must be fixing it soon and to just keep your computer updated.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      33·
      1 year ago

      This. In the days of 10.7 it was surprising how well everything worked together, now its a buggy mess. But everything is in the cloud bro.

      Apple Music is a great example, its still old iTunes but so much shit has been stuck to it over the years it sometimes fails to play music, not even mentioning handling cloud library well. Using it makes me think im on windows.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think there is much of that legacy code floating around. Apple has been pretty public about rewriting that client. 2 years ago they also killed the parts of the app that were basically web content. Browsing the catalog is now a fully native experience.

        If you’re having playback issues, you may want to post something to one the Apple communities here. That not normal.

  • Destide@feddit.ukEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Hey it’s me Nix but also it’s me Nix flakes and that’s not all it’s me Nix language