I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that’s just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not just you. At some point, search’s primary purpose went from “finding the information you’re looking for” to “getting paid to put links in front of you”. Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

    • darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Another vote for Kagi here as well… except for searching for local businesses near where I live, I revert to Google for that, but I Google through Kagi so privacy is somewhat protected

    • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Thank you. I needed this. The “free” search engines have tainted my experience of this world. Frankly, I hate it here. I’m ready for the inevitable “Apocalypse”/" Alien invasion" that stops the absolute incompetence that permeates our society. Whether you understand it or not, I beseach upon you my blessings, may your days provide success in your endeavores, and bountiful returns to your entire home. Bless you for sharing.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kagi is great. It’s a paid service but you can try 100 searches for free.

    You can use the Orion browser on iOS and set Kagi as the search engine.

    • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Lately I google for someone that should give me a direct, exact result. First five links are fucking paid ads.

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    You only tested Google and Bing.

    Qwant and DDG both use the Bing architecture.

    I agree though, search engines have become noticeably worse the last 2 years.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m pretty sure they discovered in the google monopoly case that google realized a couple years ago that a worse search experience would not negatively impact their bottom line. So makes sense

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Jesus, the “plandemic” explanation for why the Internet is dying. The Internet IS clearly dying, but this is stupid. Even if we got rid of all the bots and AI, the Internet would still be dying, because open protocols are not as exploitable as walled gardens. The value of capital in the world overwhelms the value of human labour and human interest, and all our social structures conform to the needs of capital over time.

    • sandbox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It doesn’t really, it’s just that human activity on the internet is more and more taking place on platforms without any search indexing. 20 years ago, internet forum are where you’d go for advice online. Nowadays, it’s more and more becoming discord servers and similar, which just aren’t indexed by internet search.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

    Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Huh…Can’t replicate that claim (though I would believe it happening)

      On the 20th Sep. I asked my Google Home if it would be raining.
      It responded that it would rain. I asked when it would rain.
      Home responded with “Today it won’t rain.”

      Like what? 5 seconds ago you said it would. No weather report reports rain. Where did you get the first response from??
      And I could even replicate it (have it on video)

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I can’t get it to repeat it either but it was definitely an ai auto response thing from google ai overview or whatever it’s called

        Now it’s giving distance from burner and everything lol. It’s learning 👀

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Whats funny and kind of sad, is that they know exactly what you’re searching for, and don’t give any fucks about showing you that, and instead will show you this cool other thing that they’re getting their beak wet on thats like, eh… kinda related to what you typed in. Google didn’t get dumber, they just don’t have any meaningful competition which would force them to deliver high quality results, and instead of enshittified their results to the point where they’re practically useless.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It’s intentional.

    Obviously, Google makes money showing ads during search. But they have finally bit the bullet and starting tarpitting users in search in order to show more ads.

    A quick, useful, and accurate search means that you’re on their site for the least amount of time, perhaps mere seconds. That’s not what’s best for revenue growth.

    PS: Go try Kagi and be reminded what good clean search results look like. I use it because my time has value. It’s very good.

  • Ark-5@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    4get.ca

    Has been very refreshing to use. It’s a bit slow, and you need to do a captcha periodically because they get hella bot spam. It’s got a clean interface, no sponsored results and other junk, and so far it’s felt like “old google” more than anything else. Plus they have my preferred color scheme as a built in option!

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel it is intentional. They are god damn good at hearing my talking about a baby and shoving all baby videos and social media post in every corner for ad revenue; yet when I search about something trivial I cannot get an answer.

    Even AI becoming useless the last couple of weeks compare to a few months back where it gave details answers.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t even want a baby, but I was getting nonstop diaper ads for weeks this summer.

      I think it’s because they’re desperately trying to get people to have kids(thats my hypothesis anyway). Not saying yours isn’t picking up you talking about the topic, but I got so swamped with them at one point I was starting to wonder if I was losing my mind. I asked my husband about it and he was getting them too.

      It was honestly weird as hell.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The chance that Google, for some reason, wants people to have babies, is significantly lower than the chance you just happen to fit some demographics cohort which is likely to have a baby, or to soon have a baby.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t know, it was really super weird how randomly it started shoving them in my face when it didn’t previously.

          I don’t think Google gives a shit if I have kids, but the republican party has voiced concerns over “the domestic supply of babies” multiple times over the years and I wouldn’t put it past them to give google “gratuities” to shove baby related ads on people in general, not just me specifically.

          It’s just a hypothesis I have about the sudden increase in baby related stuff. I’m not dedicated to the idea or anything, but it honestly wouldn’t surprise me if that was the case.