• AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This one won’t even make the cut as a mass shooting because not enough people were injured.

    Way to go America.

    Update: five injured, one killed. It counts as a mass shooting now.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then people will complain that an accidental discharge in the school parking lot gets lumped in with this, or that mass shootings at schools get double counted because they’re mass shootings and school shootings, or some other nonsense to avoid admitting that there’s a problem.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I really don’t understand their “gang killings don’t count as mass killings” argument. Like somehow those are different because gangs?

          • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The consensus is that people don’t care about gang members when it’s inter-gang violence. Aside from the obvious, the biggest issue with that stance is that more often than not it’s some 6 yr old bystander who’s shot through the wall of their house. Disgusting.

            *edit fixed autocorrect

            • meco03211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel like gang shootings would be a little more adversarial. Basically two groups with animosity towards the other coming to a head and the aggressor could be from either side. School shootings and other mass shootings are more vengeful and one sided.

              That’s my take at least. Not that the loss of life isn’t tragic all the same.

              • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Basically two groups with animosity towards the other coming to a head and the aggressor could be from either side.

                Any time a group of cops shoot at someone it should probably count as a gang shooting.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m generally very anti-gun, but I can see the rationale behind separating gang killings. Just like separating out familicide from mass shootings where a person shoots their three kids, their wife, then themself. Not a mass shooting in the sense that the general public was at risk of being a target.

          • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I kind of get it. Like we were focusing on the shootings where someone goes to a school, a mall, concert, etc, and just starts killing people. It’s still a shooting, and people still die, and it is unnecessary violence, but it’s still different. Similar to how if I, a white guy, kill a black man, it’s just murder… until I do it while screaming the n word. Now suddenly its different.

            It also feels a little convenient in the aspect that people were pointing out how many of the mass shootings were done by white people… So then they add in gang shootings. Now more of them are done by other races.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Killed you mean, you could have 400 injured, it’s not a mass shooting if there is less than four death.