Summary

A new WalletHub poll reveals that 74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation, which remains a major concern for most households.

Trump’s plan includes significant tariffs—up to 60% on Chinese goods and 20% on other imports—to protect American jobs and address issues like fentanyl production and border security.

Experts warn these tariffs could increase consumer prices, with middle-income families potentially losing $2,500 annually.

Analysts caution Trump’s plans may face political hurdles in Congress despite his economic-focused campaign promises.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    poll reveals that 74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation,

    Where the fuck were those people in November??

        • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yup, there definitely was. You could see it in the oh so unbiased BoTh SiDeS aRe ThE sAmE coverage from supposed left wing MSM, hint: there is no left MSM as there is no left in the States, it is either right of centre or full blown right wing anger politics with empty non answers.

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not voting. If we combine harris and non voters we get a similar number to the poll. Of course that’s a major simplification, but it still has something.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      They were told to be angry at trans kids in sports competitions, so their two braincells were busy.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I wonder if a follow up question is in order. Like do they also expect to make even more money than prices will go up.

      That’s the only vaguely plausible answer I can think of. Say hypothetically they think prices will go up 20%, but they somehow think they will be getting 40% more so it’s fine and the price increase only serves to further dissuade immigrants or something.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        If they actually think the retail price of stuff basically doubling won’t cause people to buy a lot less, they’re nuts.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    244
    ·
    6 days ago

    Are we going to pretend he gives a shit? He doesn’t. He got what he wanted, and he can’t be elected again (barring him fucking our systems so severely that he manages to force a third term on us). He’s going to wreck the justice system to avoid any consequences for his actions after his term, and he could very well kick the bucket while he’s in office anyway (dude’s got KFC gravy for blood).

    He doesn’t care. He no longer has to. He can play his country-destroying games with impunity. He has no reason to give a single fuck what the American people want.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t think he cares as much about the tariffs, but I am quite sure tariffs on Mexico and Canada were Elonia’s idea

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh it’s deeper than that, it’s money coming out of our pockets slipping through a third party and going back into the government offers. It’s an extra tax on goods by proxy. He then has a fresh revenue stream without any earmarks on it.

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      156,302,318 voters voted out of 244,666,890 eligible. 77,266,856 people voted for tRump. That’s 167,400,034 eligible voters who did not vote for tRump. So yeah…that tracks.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        And nobody gives one flying fuck about anyone who can’t be bothered to vote. If your to lazy to get off your ass and vote you have absolutely no right to complain about anything cause politically you don’t matter and you get what your lazy ass asked for.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        Non-voters don’t matter as far as the political system we’re discussing is concerned so why do we spend so much time talking about them? How many of them there are and the reasons they don’t vote are both entirely irrelevant.

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nah, with the current political climate, if you didnt vote, you voted for trump. Meaning well over half our country voted for trump.

    • Krzd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      and he can’t be elected again (barring him fucking our systems so severely that he manages to force a third term on us).

      That’s easy, create a national crisis (massive inflation + riots) and have SCOTUS suspend the 22nd amendment

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation

    How about not voting the guy in then?

          • spacesatan@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Weird how people aren’t talking about the major shortcomings of the democratic candidate anymore. I wonder why that might be.

            If Kamala was anti trans rights you’d be sitting here like “why doesnt anyone talk about trans rights anymore, those damned russians at it again”. No, it’s tablestakes that the right is awful. You’re on a left leaning platform, most people here oppose the genocide. Obviously there was going to be vocal pushback on how your candidate sucked on an issue that basic.

        • Kroxx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 days ago

          It was and they won! Now with Trump in office no more Palestinians will suffer! The humanitarian crisis is over, god-emperor himself said he wants Israel to “finish what they started”. He must mean that war needs to end, what other interpretation could possibly be accurate? I thank Jesus personally every night for helping the man win who wants to jack inflation right back up after it’s finally started taming. Our economy is in the right hands!

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        6 days ago

        As often as people beat that drum, it’s nothing but an excuse for most. They don’t have any actual thoughts or opinions on the economy. Just voting on vibes.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think it’s that and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

            Canada is on our way toward falling into that same trap.

            It’s frustrating to see the right wing party so far ahead in the polls when they have nothing to offer except “We’re not that other guy”.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      They voted because of “woke” and immigrants. A guy on social media told them those are the real problems we face.

      I can’t believe how little we are acknowledging that social media is currently being used to manipulate voters not just in US but also in Europe. Why people think that what happened in Romania didn’t also happen in US? And is not happening in other European countries?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      half of the respondents don’t care, because it hurts minorities and immigrants more.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      If the voting public were not handcuffed to the two party system by First-past-the-post voting, perhaps they would have chosen someone else.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Perhaps they should have thought about that before voting for a lunatic.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You don’t understand though. They really had to stick it to minorities and women, their every day be damned.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s almost like they think if those people have less happiness then they will have more. It’s the same nonsense that underlies trickle down economics, a childlike belief that things won’t be held onto by the ruling class with a vice-like grip.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    We can all agree that polling is completely meaningless now yeah? It obviously has zero correlation with reality.

    • Tin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was an election season where the race was polling around 50/50 pretty much throughout. Even when one candidate had a lead, with margins of error, no they didn’t. A ~50% probability of losing is huge, even if many polls did show her slightly ahead. Consider a 20-sided die. 9 sides are red, 11 are blue. You wouldn’t be surprised if you rolled red.

      News media has no idea how to talk about polls because they don’t want to talk about probability, they want to talk about which number is bigger as if it’s a scoreboard. I didn’t want him to win, but the polls weren’t wrong.

      • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Even if they didnt show him winning, a poll saying its roughly 50/50 is like saying to someone your going to flip a coin and then them being flabbergasted when it comes out tails, what did you expect, its probability, not the current vote percentage.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    How’s this news? That’s literally what MAGA was selling the entire time. The so called “Temporary Hardships”. They promised and they’re going to deliver some economic hardships, that was the sales pitch and people voted for it. Anybody shocked is just not paying attention.

    • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seriously…. If 74% think his economic plan is bad, and yet a majority said that ‘the economy’ was the biggest reason for who they chose…. How?

      • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        By economy they just mean the price of things that they regularly buy or the cost of a meal at the Red Lobster. They don’t want their taxes to increase and by taxes they just mean income tax.

        The best way I can put it is that these aren’t serious people. They have very little understanding of how the systems that keep them alive actually work. Look at taxes and the messaging from conservative’s “they are stealing your money.” That’s super easy for someone to understand. Much harder to understand that taxes pay for public services, roads, and clean water.

        I’ve got in-laws that stuck their aging parents in public subsidized retirement housing. These guys also vote republican. Lucky for them they live in a blue state with decent retirement care otherwise there is no way they could afford that level of care. We are talking thousands a week for over a decade. Do they have any understanding of how that works? No, not at all they just want to complain about taxes being high.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        If I learnt anything recently, “polls” quotes on Lemmy and reddit mean jackshit.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let him do this tariff thing. Maybe people will finally learn how “good” he and his party is with money when the US economy is completely ruined.

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 days ago

      Republicans have been tanking the economy my entire life. Their voters do not learn

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I understand the appeal of “teaching them a lesson”, purely for spiteful reasons. But there are problems with that approach:

      • You can teach a child never to put his hand on the burner by putting his hand on the burner. He’ll learn alright, but he’ll also have a nasty burn. Similarly, you don’t want people to learn the dangers of populism and extreme right by letting the extreme-right populist do stupid shit and wreck their lives.

      • We who didn’t vote for the dangerous populist live in the same country as those who did: even if we wanted to let the dangerous populist hurt them to teach them a lesson, he’ll hurt us too in the process.

      • History always repeat itself: even if everybody learns a hard lesson after Trump is done wrecking the economy - or worse - our children, or our children’s children will invariably elect another Trump some day. So we might as well do our best to limit the damage each time.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is not spiteful. I’m looking at this from the outside (as far as anyone can be with a world-dominating economy like the US), and I’ve given up any hope that Americans as such would learn without really, really painful lessons that manage to pass even through the thick skulls of the MAGA-heads. I don’t wish anyone to suffer, but at the moment I cannot see any way for this lesson to set in without it.

        That innocent people are hurt is horrible. But as only a smaller number of citizens have voted for the smart alternative, those who didn’t vote and those who voted for Trump together are the majority. It could have been prevented if enough people had gotten their asses out of their houses - but that did not happen. And the death wish for the US was strong - Hitler only had about 33% of the votes and had to resort to political tricks to get where Trump was carried to by a majority of the voters. Think about that.

        And yes, history repeats itself. You were extremely lucky to skip a few cycles - in comparison to e.g. Europe - but the signs were there for a long time, and way to few people cared. Maybe we all get lucky and it “just” turns into a 1929+ depression, focused primarily on the US.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Your second point only applies to people who voted against him. If you didn’t vote you voted for him.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean, people are still fueling the flames now for not voting Democrat because AOC is being shafted by the establishment, ignoring the bigger picture. When the GQP proves to be far, far worse, they will still be spouting something akin that both sides are the same. Part of it has to do because propaganda campaigns plays both sides and this is the way the side that could vote Democrat is played nowadays.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    He said he was gonna.

    "But, we didn’t think . . . "

    He SAID he was gonna.

    "We really didn’t expect "

    HE F*CKING SAID HE WAS GONNA!