The student, Darryl George, was suspended for 13 days because his hair is out of compliance when let down, according to a disciplinary notice issued by Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu, Texas. It was his first day back at the school after spending a month at an off-site disciplinary program.

George, 18, already has spent more than 80% of his junior year outside of his regular classroom.

He was first pulled from the classroom at the Houston-area school in August after school officials said his braided locs fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes and violated the district’s dress code. His family argues the punishment violates the CROWN Act, which became law in Texas in September and is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination. The school says the CROWN Act does not address hair length.

  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do schools care what length someone’s hair is anyway? Are they just power mad control freaks?

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      141
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s Texas, so my money is on a few good ol’ boys who 1.) don’t appreciate the kid’s skin color, 2.) don’t love that he’s nationally embarrassed them for the fools they are, and 3.) are dense enough to believe they can still “win” this thing.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Schools exist to make your kids into little workers for their kids.

    • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because everyone should look like everyone else. Like clones. After all working in the factories needs co-ordination.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its generally conservative viewpoints of fitting people into “the norm”. Conservatism/traditionalism doesnt stop in the U.S, japan has schools for example that require students dye their hair black and conform to a very atrict uniform. Although that requirement was dropped very recently in tokyo(like 2021), it likely still exist in some regions.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are they just power mad control freaks?

      Yes. Schools have cultures just like anywhere else. Once the administration has a sufficient number of power-hungry losers, this is the end result.

      They can never do anything wrong. It is always someone else’s fault for everything. And all of them reinforce this mentality in each other.

      It’s disgusting.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          America is huge, it varies wildly by region. Nobody in my area gives a shit about stuff like that, and didn’t ~25 years ago when I was in HS either

        • Additional_Prune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had some punk students with non-natural hair colors when I was a high school teacher in California, and that was a long time ago. Nobody cared. This story is from Texas, though.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s always confused me why schools think suspension would be an effective punishment when the kid often doesn’t want to be in class anyway (not in the case of this kid obviously) and definitely won’t be learning anything.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s what you do when you can’t deal with a child to prevent them fucking up other people’s schooling.

        I guess it also puts pressure on the parents to do something.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except, at least when I was in school, they’re not given schoolwork to do when in suspension. They just have to sit there and do nothing all day. They don’t learn anything.

          • Zacryon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well his locks are too long. So it’s obviously a security concern since other students could trip over them and fall. /s

        • cooljacob204@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except it’s not used like that, it’s used to discipline anything they feel is a “big” deal.

          Funny story, I got a week suspension in middle school for bringing a low powered laser to school. On the same day friend of mine lit a fire in his desk and got 3 days.

          The school admin was pushing for a much worse penalty for me for some reason and my parents flipped their shit and somehow got it “reduced” to a week.

    • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never heard the term “in-school suspension”. It sounds like what I remember as “detention”, but done during what would otherwise be the school day, yeah? On top of this being some blatant racism, it seems like a really poor use of school resources.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        ISS is literally just detention. Your put into a classroom where you can’t talk to anyone, or do anything besides your work. You even take a separate lunch time then everyone else.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        They call it ‘in school suspension’ (ISS) to differentiate from out of school suspension, where the student is sent home and told not to return for a period of time. Typically ISS is overseen by a faculty member and the students are given relevant workbooks/sheets to whatever courses they’re enrolled in to complete and they are required to be quiet, work alone, and are not allowed to used phones/entertainment.

        At least, that’s how it was when I was still in highschool (2014).

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Detention for me was something you did after school. Essentially you were kept late.

        In-school suspension is just like detention during school hours.

    • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is even worse than that. He wears his hair in a way that the it does not go below his eyebrows and ear lobes. But the school is mad that it could . It makes my blood boil.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s absolutely terrible, they’re setting him back while he stands up for his rights.

        That hair is awesome too. Fuck them.

        I hope he wins a lot of money from the delays he’s received and punitive damages beyond that.

        • interceder270@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah. They’re preventing him from getting his education for some racist bullshit.

          Everyone who has a hand in this pie needs to be fired and future wages garnished to repay him for what he’s lost.

          We can even do the math to find out how much it costs to educate 1 student for 1 day and then multiply that by how many days he’s been suspended.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It never ceased to amaze me how US schools are being run like concentration camps. How very land of the free.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pestering a kid about his hair style is literally the same as starving him in a prison camp

        • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The comment isn’t phrased like sarcasm though. Sarcasm would be something like:

          God, American schools are just like concentration camps, how do you handle it?

          And even then, being sarcastic here with a phrase like that would mean that this is a dumb thing for people to complain about, which also isn’t true.

  • mx_smith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How can anyone blatantly break a law and not get charged? The state has a law prohibiting what these school admins are doing so why aren’t the police called and charges filled against them? I’m guess the police are fine with whatever racist authoritarian bullshit the school does.

  • littlewonder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I knew this case was a slam dunk* the second I heard about it. Not just because it’s ridiculous but because this exact scenario has been through the courts before.

    The voters should hold the school board accountable for the tax dollars they wasted and vote them out.*

    ^* ^This ^is ^Texas ^though ^so ^everything’s ^made ^up ^and ^the ^points ^don’t ^matter.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Texas even has a law forbidding this. I lived in Houston for a few years, and it’s actually astonishing the General Assembly passed a law to forbid discrimination of hair style.

      Just to give you a general idea of how fucked up these school officials are. They’re worse than the worst of Texas.

  • interceder270@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    said his braided locs fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes

    This means all girls can’t have hair below their eyebrows and ear lobes? Surely there are instances of white girls being punished for this, right?

  • joshuanozzi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well thank fuck these school officials are protecting students from this hairrorist. Show the world we will not accept acts of hairrorism in schools! No matter how backward and stupid it makes us look! Even when state law says we’re not allowed to do this! Stay strong, delicate white leadership! It’s For The Children we deny this young man an education!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it is time for the school to decide that. And then decide that his education is more important than what they think about his hairstyle.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s texas, in a county entirely run by ®acists.

        you already know what they ‘picked’.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The state has, at least in cases like this. Texas passed the Crown Act. This racist district is ignoring the law.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              From the article:

              State Rep. Ron Reynolds, a Democrat and chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, said he planned to file an amendment to the law during the next session that “specifically addresses length to stop their pretextual argument to not comply with the Crown Act.”

              I’ll note that there’s no federal equivalent to the Crown Act. Does that mean that congress is more racist than Texas?

              Would explain a fucking lot, to be honest.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, that’s already been decided at the state level (note the summary pointing out that Texas passed the Crown Act, which makes it illegal for admins to consider hairstyle more important than education).

      Now is the time for the racists who refuse to acknowledge that decision to lose their fucking jobs.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Time decide what’s important. Compliance or your culture/spiritual/personal identity

      • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because he’s missed 80% of his classes, which won’t help with the challenges he will already face as black man, and because this would be a silly hill to die on.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because he’s missed 80% of his classes

          Looking at other articles it looks like that missed classroom time was for continued suspensions over his hairstyle.

          This effort has apparently been backed by the district superintendent.

          Greg Poole, who has been district superintendent since 2006, said the policy is legal and teaches students to conform as a sacrifice benefitting everyone.

          When you are asked to conform ... and give up something for the betterment of the whole, there is a psychological benefit,” Poole said. “We need more teaching (of) sacrifice.”

          Just for bonus points the school district’s policy is not only racist but sexist. This policy only applies to males.

          Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a t-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

          I have no idea what “geometrical” hair would be.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            “When you are asked to conform … and give up something for the betterment of the whole, there is a psychological benefit,”

            We want you all to be good little soldiers so when you graduate, you can go off and be good little soldiers.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can’t believe I had to scroll this far to find this quote - anyone else horrified that a school superintendent can say this and think it’s ok? Military school, sure, it serves a purpose that may save your life, but this doesn’t appear to be a military school, and conformity is not an educational value

              Put that together with this kid missing 80% of the year so far over hair and there’s something seriously wrong with that school.

              I mean, it’s a weird hill for the kid to die on, and I don’t see how it’s in his interest to do this, but it’s a serious failing of the school to impact his education like this

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The superintendent with his comment has made it clear it has nothing to do with hair, and everything to do with exerting control and punishment when that control is rejected.

          • Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Holy heck?! Who is this psychopath?! “You must conform!” in this case basically = “You must assimilate!”. This is why some version of CRT, at least an overview of the fundamentals, SHOULD be taught in highshool so students can recognise these sorts of policies for what they often are. But the system is hardly going to educate the subjects of its oppression is it, or they might actually recognize and resist policies and practices that are rooted in racism and discrimination. Can’t have that!

    • 1847953620@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you mean that worrying about someone’s hairstyle is completely outside of the scope of- and detrimental to the resources of- education? Or that someone’s specific hairstyle can be detrimental to the quality of education received itself?

    • nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone decided, it’s education. The dumbfucks on the schoolboard haven’t gotten the memo, but they will…